Litigating Against Law Firm Englander Fischer for a Year. Pro Se.
By Bianca Cypser
For one year, I represented myself against a board-certified litigator. I was sued
as a delinquent tenant. I had paid every dollar.
I thought lawyers followed the law. The scariest part wasn't the lawsuit. It was
realizing a licensed attorney would file it after I had paid every dollar.
I've been a St. Pete business owner for 20 years. For 12 of them, I ran my
business at 5029 Central Avenue. I paid my rent every month. My lease ran through
December 31, 2025.
On October 1, while I was still there and still paying, my landlord, Hal
Hershkowitz, signed a lease for my space with a new tenant at higher rent. Nobody
asked me.
Then the pressure started. Their broker told me he "personally would not mess
around with Hal." Letters from their attorney, Leonard Englander of Englander
Fischer, demanded I be out by October 24 or be sued for $81,000. Fighting would
cost me "thousands of dollars in damages and thousands of dollars in legal fees,"
and hurt my credit. "This is the last warning."
I asked, respectfully, which part of my lease I had broken. They never answered.
By October 22, I was afraid to walk into my own business after dark. So I gave
them a date: fully out by December 1. I asked them to put it in writing.
The next day, Hal texted me: "even though I might file a lawsuit this week, the
judicial system will not be able to act quick enough to remove you before then."
And: "Things become irreversible for you."
He knew the courts couldn't remove me. He kept going.
They never put my date in writing. Instead, their attorney sent a final notice:
sign their agreement by 5:00 PM the next day, be out by November 6, and "your
security deposit will be returned." My own security deposit, held over me to make
me sign.
I didn't sign. They didn't even wait for their own deadline. On November 4, they
filed an eviction against me, on a residential five-day form, for a commercial
space.
They called me a "holdover tenant." My lease ran through December. They called me
a "delinquent tenant." I had paid every dollar. They claimed more than $50,000.
I was never served. I found out the next day, when a debt settlement company I had
never heard of contacted me trying to collect. I answered anyway. And while they
were evicting me, they kept collecting my rent. September. October. November.
December.
Nothing was owed. Not one dollar.
I moved out December 4, with December's rent paid. I filed my claims and sent them
formal questions, as the rules allow. They never answered a single one. Under
Florida law, unanswered questions count as admissions.
So they admitted it. Hal Hershkowitz, Leonard Englander, his paralegal, and their
broker coordinated a campaign of pressure to force me out. I left because of
"cumulative pressure and intimidation." They sued me not "to obtain a legitimate
legal remedy," but to pressure me out "through fear of litigation."
For months, they litigated against me without ever questioning my right to
represent myself. Then my questions went unanswered, and those admissions locked
in. Suddenly, I couldn't represent myself.
Then they accused me of the unlicensed practice of law, a third-degree felony
under section 454.23, Florida Statutes, claiming I was filing for my company. They
later admitted, by never answering, that I had filed every document in my own
name. I was defending myself, in a lawsuit where they had sued me personally, for
something that never happened.
On June 30, 2026, Leonard Englander stood in court and told the judge:
"The plaintiff has received all of the money that was due under the terms of the
lease. All of it, all of the rent."
Not because I finally paid. I paid on time, every month, the whole time.
At that same hearing, he offered to drop his request for fees if I dropped all of
my claims forever. I said no. I wasn't going to give up the truth to make their
fee request go away.
They still won. Not on the facts. On technicalities that didn't even fit. They
said I never answered. I did. They said I was filing for my company. They admitted
I wasn't. That's all they had.
My motions were never heard. My motion to determine rent was never ruled on. My
motion to hold them to their own admissions was never ruled on. My hearing was
canceled and never reset. Not once were the merits of my case heard.
The rules applied to me. I followed them. They didn't seem to apply to them.
Now they want me to pay their attorney's fees, for a civil theft claim that was
only in a version of my counterclaim they argued didn't count. The judge agreed.
He said the only operative counterclaim was my original one, and civil theft was
never in it. When it helped them, it didn't count. When it could make them money,
suddenly it did.
When I asked the court to reconsider, Leonard Englander compared my position to
"the dark humor story of a defendant who sought mercy from the court after having
killed his parents because he was an orphan."
I paid every dollar of my rent.
I have appealed. They missed their deadline to answer, and the appeals court had
to order them to respond. Their answer admits I paid my rent. They still argue
technicalities, because they can't win on the merits. They even argue I wasn't
"injuriously affected" by the judgment that threw out every one of my claims.
I didn't build this record. They did, every piece of it: their text messages,
their emails, their filings, and the transcripts of their own words in court. For
a year, I stayed quiet and let it build. Now it's built, and I finally have a
voice.
This has taken a toll on my health and my business. I've lost time with clients
and spent hundreds of hours I'll never be paid for. All I've ever wanted is the
truth.
No single woman business owner deserves to be targeted and treated the way I was. I know things like this happen to woman daily, and this behavior needs to stop.

I will never quit. This is only the beginning. More is coming. I'll be sharing a
new piece of this story every day. Follow me to keep up.
My story will be heard. I promise.
Bianca Cypser
Every fact here is in the public court record:
Pinellas County Circuit Court, Case No. 25-006232-CI
Second District Court of Appeal, Case No. 2D2026-1814
(1)_edited.png)



Good website maintenance is important for both visitors and site owners. Regularly checking navigation menus, updating instructions, and fixing broken links can prevent many common problems. It is also helpful to ensure that forms work correctly on different devices and that important text remains readable. A website does not need an overly complicated bdg game design to be useful. Reliable information, practical organization, and consistent performance can create a much better experience.